Sample report library
The RNLI, British Red Cross, and Cancer Research UK samples show how CharityWatch presents public-register evidence, financial context, governance disclosures, and cautious review signals without overstating what public data can prove.
Priority 1 public samples
Each sample uses public Charity Commission register information and illustrates the same responsible structure: evidence first, risk wording second, and clear limitations throughout.
Charity 209603
Reporting up to date, on time
Income
£251.3m
Expenditure
£250.7m
Large-scale lifesaving charity with substantial donations and legacies, major volunteer infrastructure, subsidiary governance notes, and a clear public-safety mission.
Why this sample helps: Useful for seeing how CharityWatch frames a generally well-documented national charity while still recording governance context and evidence boundaries.
Charity 220949
Reporting up to date, on time
Income
£287.1m
Expenditure
£310.3m
Humanitarian charity with emergency-response activity, government grants and contracts, a large employee base, and subsidiary-director governance disclosures.
Why this sample helps: Useful for reviewing income-mix complexity, public-contract context, and careful wording where expenditure exceeds income in the reviewed year.
Charity 1089464
Reporting up to date, on time
Income
£734.8m
Expenditure
£714.7m
Very large medical-research charity with significant donation income, trading activity, research expenditure, and trustee-benefit disclosure context.
Why this sample helps: Useful for seeing how a Diligence Report can handle high-volume financial data without turning public-source signals into allegations.
Report anatomy
The paid product is built for donors, trustees, journalists, advisers, and grantmakers who need a structured first-pass review of a named charity or funding decision.
Official register identity, charity number, activities, and filing status
Income, expenditure, donation, trading, government-funding, and charitable-spend pattern review
Trustee, employee, volunteer, subsidiary, remuneration, and benefit-disclosure context
Evidence-led summary, cautious risk language, open questions, and next-step donor review prompts
The value of the report is disciplined caution. CharityWatch should make review easier, not overclaim what public information can prove.
The example reports are public-source demonstrations and are not allegations of wrongdoing against any charity.
CharityWatch Diligence Reports are decision-support outputs, not legal, audit, accountancy, regulatory, or investment opinions.
A review signal means context or follow-up is recommended; it does not mean fraud has occurred.
Customers should use the report alongside direct charity engagement, professional advice where needed, and their own grant or donation policies.
Next step
Buy a one-off Diligence Report for a named charity or funding decision, then complete the secure intake form after checkout so the analyst review can be scoped correctly.