Practical guides for charity due diligence and donation confidence.

These launch resources explain how to use public charity information responsibly before donating, funding, reporting on, or monitoring an organisation.

How to check a UK charity before donating

Use the official register first, then review trustees, filing behaviour, charitable objects, income, expenditure, and any gaps that require direct follow-up.

Start with the charity number rather than the trading name where possible. Names can be similar, rebranded, or used informally, while the charity number anchors the official record.

Check whether the organisation is registered in England and Wales, Scotland, or Northern Ireland, because separate registers apply. Some organisations may not appear on the England and Wales register because they are below the registration threshold, excepted, or exempt.

Look for consistency between the charity's stated aims, programme description, income, spending, and public communications. A mismatch does not prove wrongdoing, but it gives you a sensible question to ask before donating.

What Charity Commission filings can reveal

Public filings can show financial scale, reporting discipline, trustee details, charitable activity, and regulator actions, but they rarely tell the whole story alone.

Useful register fields include what the charity does, trustees, finance information such as income and expenditure, and any actions the Charity Commission has taken against the charity.

Late filings, sudden changes in income or expenditure, or repeated governance changes should be treated as prompts for context. The responsible question is not 'is this charity bad?' but 'what evidence explains the pattern?'.

Public records are strongest when combined with direct questions to the charity, grant agreements, impact reporting, independent references, and your own risk tolerance.

How CharityWatch uses AI responsibly

AI helps organise and summarise public-source signals, but human review, source hierarchy, caveats, and correction routes remain central to the service.

CharityWatch uses AI-assisted analysis to highlight patterns across register data and supporting public information. The output should remain explainable and linked to evidence rather than presented as a black-box accusation.

Risk summaries are deliberately phrased as review signals. They help users decide what to ask next; they do not replace legal, audit, accountancy, regulatory, or grantmaking judgement.

Where a charity, trustee, or user believes information is incomplete or inaccurate, the correction and right-of-reply route should be used so records can be reviewed responsibly.

Need a structured review for one charity?

Use the resources above for self-checking, or buy a Diligence Report if you need a more structured evidence-led review for a grant, donation, journalism, trustee, or advisory decision.